Book excerpts Sri Raya Ramananda Samvad Bhakti Mixed with Empiric Knowledge

Bhakti Mixed with Empiric Knowledge

prabhu kahe,—“eho bāhya, āge kaha āra”
rāya kahe,—“jñāna-miśrā bhakti—sādhya-sāra”

Upon Śrīman Mahāprabhu saying that renouncing one’s sva-dharma, or occupational duties, is external, Rāmānanda Rāya proposed that āna-miśrā-bhakti, or devotion mixed with empiric speculation, is the essence of perfection.

āna-miśrā-bhakti bhakti mixed with empiric knowledge.āna (knowledge) has three divisions: tat-padārtha-jñāna – knowledge of the Absolute Reality (para-tattva), or the Lord (bhagavat-tattva); tva-padārtha-jñāna – knowledge of the constitutional position of the jīva, which includes knowledge of the relationship between the jīva and Brahman; and jīva-brahma-aikya-jñāna – knowledge of the oneness between the jīva and Brahman.

This last limb, namely, jīva-brahma-aikya, is completely opposed to devotion because therein, knowledge of the constitutional relationship between Brahman as master and the jīva as servant cannot manifest, or rather, awaken. The first two limbs of āna, namely knowledge of jīva-tattva and knowledge of brahma-tattva, or bhagavat-tattva, are not in opposition to bhakti, because they do not hinder nourishment of a master-servant relationship.

The meaning of the word āna in the current verse might be stretched, and thus interpreted in such a way as to suggest that bhakti mixed with these three limbs of āna is called ānamiśrā-bhakti (devotional service to Śrī Kṛṣṇa with a desire to enjoy the fruits of transcendental knowledge), but that would not be correct.

It is worth considering here that without the help of bhakti, nirviśea-jñāna (knowledge of the impersonal Brahman effulgence) on its own is completely incapable of bestowing sāyujya-mukti, or impersonal liberation. Thus, in the verse under consideration the āna-miśrābhakti referred to specifically indicates the third type of āna, or jīva-brahma-aikya-jñāna, which promulgates knowledge of the non-difference between the individual soul and the Supreme Soul.

In addition, there are even some sādhakas on the path of bhakti-yoga whose predominant goal is to attain knowledge that does not obstruct bhakti, such as bhagavat-tattva-jñāna (knowledge of the reality about the Supreme Personality of Godhead), jīva-tattvaāna (knowledge about the reality of the minute spiritual living entity), and sambandha-jñāna (the accompanying knowledge of the relationship between both), as well as māyā-tattva-jñāna (knowledge about the reality of the illusory energy). For this reason, their practice of the limbs of bhakti also remains mixed with āna. Therefore, one might include their practice in the definition of āna-miśrā-bhakti.

Regardless, the āna-miśra-bhakti referred to in this verse by Śrī Rāmānanda only equates with that bhakti which is mixed with jīva-brahma-aikya-jñāna. We shall see that this is indicated directly in the next verse, brahma-bhūta prasannātmā. In their commentaries on this verse, Śrī Śakarācārya, Śrīpāda Śrīdhara Svāmī, and Śrī Viśvanātha Cakravartī hākura have all accepted that the āna mentioned here is jīva-brahma-aikya-jñāna.

Although on the path of śuddha-bhakti there is a statute allowing one to abandon his sva-dharma, a certain level of qualification to do this is required. An edict to that effect appears in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam:

tāvat karmāi kurvīta
na nirvidyeta y
āvatā
mat-kath
āśravaādau vā
śraddhā yāvan na jāyate

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (11.20.9)

As long as disinterest in karma has not arisen, or until, by the mercy of some mahā-purua, one experiences the awakening of faith in the process of hearing and chanting bhagavat-kathā, one should continue to perform karma.”

It is only upon the awakening of extremely thick śraddhā by the grace of a pure devotee that one receives the qualification to enter kevalā-bhakti, or exclusive devotion, and it is then that one becomes qualified to abandon prescribed duties (sva-dharma).

When an unqualified person renounces prescribed duties, there is fear of an inauspiciousness occurrence. For this reason, Śrīman Mahāprabhu is saying that it is external. If hearing and chanting are not coming from love within the heart, but rather from some mentally conceived sense of duty, then this practice, too, is external or superficial. Śrīman Mahāprabhu is looking for an explanation of something superior; therefore, Śrī Rāmānanda Rāya describes ānamiśrā-bhakti as the sādhya, or state of perfection.

Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Prabhupāda explains that while in this universe, one who is advancing in his activities along the path of self-realization will still be subject to some asmitā1, or material identification, but when that false conception of the self is dispelled, he crosses over the Virajā River, which is beyond the influence of the three modes of material nature, and reaches the neutral (sāmya) or unmanifest (avyakta) state of the three modes.

The material universe manifests from the external energy, whereas Vaikuṇṭha dhāma, the abode of the Lord, is manifest from the internal potency. In between the two are Brahma-loka and the Virajā River. This river is the place of shelter for those jīvas who are detached from dull matter and who deny the material varieties within the material creation. Those who have acquired this unmanifest state may not enter Vaikuṇṭha but must remain outside; therefore it is termed as bāhya, or external. Just as the realization of the sādhakas who have abandoned their prescribed duties within this world does not equate to realization of Vaikuṇṭha or Goloka-dhāma, similarly those who make their goal detachment from material enjoyment only receive realization of a non-conscious impersonal reality. For this reason, it is also external. In fact, only prema-bhakti qualifies as parā-bhakti (transcendental devotional service to the Supreme Lord). Unless one reaches the state of sāmya or avyakta (the neutral state of the three modes), it is actually impossible to attain prema-bhakti.

In āna-miśrā-bhakti,āna remains prominent, and thus it is not bhakti at all. Rather, it is merely an offense at the lotus feet of Bhagavān. It becomes possible to obtain bhakti from the sāmya or avyakta platform if one somehow gets the association of a pure guru and Vaiṣṇavas. If a piece of gold, the size and shape of a mustard seed, is mixed into a huge heap of golden mustard seeds, it is extremely difficult to distinguish it, but once the pile of seeds is set on fire and reduced to ashes it is easy to find that piece of gold.

In the same manner, in the saintly association of the pure spiritual master and Vaiṣṇava devotees, that mountain-like heap of āna is burned to ashes by the fire of hearing and chanting, whereupon pure bhakti (that piece of gold) may easily be obtained. Accordingly, where āna-miśrā-bhakti ends, śuddha-bhakti, or pure devotion, begins. ānīs desire to obtain sāyujya, which is the liberation of merging with the effulgence of the Lord, yet they cannot attain their goal by the process of āna alone. They may obtain it only by virtue of mixing this āna with bhakti.

The practice of thisāna-miśrā bhakti is never capable of awakening prema; therefore, this type of āna presents an obstruction to śuddhabhakti. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (11.20.31) states:

tasmān mad-bhakti-yuktasya
yogino vai mad-
ātmana
na jñ
āna na ca vairāgya
pr
āya śreyo bhaved iha

Thus the yogī who is connected with My bhakti and absorbed in thinking of Me, need not cultivate āna or renunciation. His auspiciousness is achieved only through devotion to Me.”

 

brahma-bhūta prasannātmā
na śocati na kā
kati
sama
sarveu bhūteu
mad-bhakti
labhate parām

Śrīmad Bhagavad-gītā (18.54)

“ ‘A person happily absorbed in Brahman neither laments for nor desires anything. Being equipoised in his vision of all living beings, he obtains parābhakti (transcendental devotional service to Me) which is endowed with the symptoms of prema.’

There is a multitude of mantras in the Vedas establishing the dif-ference between the jīva and Brahman. Some examples are given here:

(1) “Pradhāna-ketra-jña-patir gueśa – that Paramātmā is the controller of the guas and master of the living entities” (Śvetāśvatara Upaniad 3.6.16).

(2) “Tam āhur agrya purua mahāntam – sages declare Him to be the foremost and greatest of persons” (Śvetāśvatara Upaniad 3.3.19).

(3) “Yāthātathyato ’rthān vyadadhāt – it is He who awards the many jīvas’ necessities” (Īśopaniad 3.8).

(4) “Teneda pūra puruea sarvam – by that Person’s arrangement, this universe is complete in every respect” (Śvetāśvatara Upaniad 3.3.9).

(5) “Nityo nityānā – He is supreme among all eternal beings” (Kaha Upaniad 2.2.13, Śvetāśvatara Upaniad 3.6.13).

This compilation of sutras directly demonstrates that the jīva can never dissolve and become one with Brahman in any situation. Persons who attain the brahma-bhūta platform are in one of two categories. One type, despite reaching this platform, disrespects the names, forms, qualities, and pastimes of Bhagavān, as well as His devotees. Such persons continue to endeavor exclusively for sāyujyamukti. The brahma-bhūta (self-realized) persons of this category are offenders. Instead of achieving liberation, this kind of person continues to rotate in the cycle of birth and death, taking birth in demonic species. The other kind of brahma-bhūta souls, being non-offenders, easily achieve the shelter of the devotees and attain parābhakti.

1Asmitā: the false egoism arising from the conceptions of “I” and “mine” in relation to the material body.

[CC-by-ND GVP]

Must Read

The Appearance and Essential Teachings of Srila Vyasadeva

The Srimad-Bhagavatam is a glorification of the bhaktas and Bhagavan. There are two kinds of bhagavata: bhakta-bhagavat and grantha-bhagavat. When you approach the bhaktas and take shelter of them then through them you can understand the granthas. Unless you surrender to the bhaktas you will remain attached to your material family and worldly life. If you properly chant the gayatri-mantras then you become related to the bhaktas. The bhaktas then give bhakti. Bhakti is in the hearts of the bhaktas. And when you receive bhakti, along with bhakti comes sakti. You become then related to God. This is an easy process.

SADHU – WARRIOR or BOTH?

In one battle, armed with outdated rifles and bayonets, Kunja Bihari led his squadron in a surprise attack on a bunker behind enemy lines. Kunja Bihari alone survived the ambush. From the captured bunker, he used the heavy artillery to disable many advancing tanks and largely due to his efforts, India won one of the most critical battles in the campaign. He was locked in the bunker for two weeks, unable to escape, and lived on survival food pills. He spent the time chanting harinama incessantly

VERSE 7: The Process of Performing Bhajana of Śrī Kṛṣṇa’s Names and Pastimes

If, however, one continuously takes the medicine of this sugar-candy of Śrī Kṛṣṇa’s names, form, qualities and pastimes with great honour and faith, the sweet taste of Śrī Kṛṣṇa’s name will gradually increase and the disease of material enjoyment, which is rooted in the desire to be aloof from Kṛṣṇa, will be...

WHAT MAKES FOR A REAL GURU SEVAKA?

Śrīla Gurudeva had a sevaka who was very handsome. He was one of Gurudeva’s earlier sevakas. He would cook and play mṛdaṅga and sang melodiously in kīrtana. He was quite intelligent and could speak hari-kathā very well. One time, Śrīla Gurudeva asked him to arrange a place for some guests to stay in the temple. He gave an impudent answer and from that time started behaving strangely. One day, the owner of a factory came to visit Gurudeva.

BILVAMANGALA'S SAMADHI-YOGA

On the way, however, he again became attracted to a lady. remembering his gurudeva's advice, the prayed to God, "why do I, again and again, become attached to these physical bodies? My material body and senses keep disturbing me time and again." He decided to no longer follow his mind, and thus he pierced out both his eyes. He then entered into samadhi-yoga and came to Vrndavana.

More Articles Like This